Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1. There are fewer risks associated with external recruiting than with internal since the pool of potential candidates is much larger.
2. The screening of job applicants in order to hire the best candidate is known as the preference process.
3. References are an effective way to obtain reliable information about a prospective job candidate.
4. The most commonly used employee-selection technique is interviewing.
1. FALSE
There are fewer risks with internal recruiting. Internal candidates are already known and are familiar with the organization.
2. FALSE
The selection process is the screening of job applicants to hire the best candidate.
3. FALSE
References are a problem. Many employers don't give honest assessments of former employees, for two reasons: (1) They fear that if they say anything negative, they can be sued by the former employee. (2) They fear that if they say anything positive and the job candidate doesn't pan out, they can be sued by the new employer.
4. TRUE
Interviewing, the most commonly used employee-selection technique, may take place face to face, by videoconference, or, as is increasingly the case, via the Internet.
You might also like to view...
The maximum number of shares a company may issue are ______________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
A nondeductible charitable contribution is a permanent book/tax difference.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Peter contracted to purchase five (5 ) cases of soda and a vacuum cleaner because Peter was planning a party for his son's graduation. Both contract forms that Peter signed contained exclusion of damages clauses; i.e., each contract stated that the
buyer had no right to sue the seller in the event that the goods were defective. Instead, each seller's sole obligation was to replace or repair the defective goods within a reasonable time of being notified of the defect(s). These clauses in the contract were set forth in the ordinary type of the contract and were not especially conspicuous. The vacuum cleaner was delivered on Friday, the day before the party, when the rugs in Peter's home were quite dirty. The vacuum cleaner did not work properly. Peter notified the seller, who responded by saying that nothing could be done until the following week. Frantic because guests were coming, Peter hired a cleaning service to clean the rugs. While serving the soda to guests, one of the bottle caps burst from an unopened bottle with great force. It struck Peter in the eye and he required medical treatment and hospitalization. Eventually, Peter sued both sellers for damages. Peter sought the expense of the cleaning service from one. From the other, Peter sought damages for personal injury, including his medical and hospitalization expenses. Both defendant-sellers cited the exclusion of damages clauses as their defense.
When is it possible for the lease rate to fall below zero?
What will be an ideal response?