When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturalistic study?
A) When the study is so innocuous that there is no risk of harm.
B) When the study focuses on public behavior that could be observed by anyone, so that participants would have no expectation of privacy.
C) When the IRB has reviewed the proposal and agreed that informed consent is not necessary.
D) All of the above
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
The ______ ballot, introduced during the Progressive Era and still in use today, lists candidates from all parties and is marked in the privacy of a voting booth.
A. Pendleton B. Jackson C. bipartisan D. Australian
Explain the difference between the powers of the national and state governments under the U.S. Constitution. Be sure to give specific examples
What will be an ideal response?
All of the following have historically been major think tanks with special importance in U.S. policy formation EXCEPT ______.
A. the American Enterprise Institute B. the Brookings Institution C. the Heritage Foundation D. the National Center for Policy Analysis
Each justice has three or four ________, recent law school graduates who temporarily work for him or her, do research, help prepare the justice with background information, and assist with the writing of opinions.
a. assistant justices b. associate justices c. bailiffs d. law clerks