What factors determine the admissibility and relevancy of evidence?
What will be an ideal response?
The determination of relevancy is the cornerstone of evidence admissibility. Such evaluation must weigh the probative value of an item carefully, considering whether the introduction of such best serves the interest of justice. States vary in their interpretation of the relevance of an item in question. The first only establishes the relevance of material that makes the point in question more probable than not.The second system of inquiry holds that relevance may be established only in cases in which the inference—a deduction that may be drawn from evidence—is more probable than others.The third system, championed by the preeminent scholar John Henry Wigmore, relied on an evaluation of the "plus value" of the item in question. More succinctly, evidence was deemed relevant only in situations in which the probative value of an item was greater than minimal. The final standard, and by far the most common, is the introduction of evidence that tends to demonstrate the truth of the point in question more than its absence.
You might also like to view...
__________ is defined as a fairly rigid, oversimplified view or image of a particular social group that is then applied to individuals who belong to that group
a. ageism c. heterosexism b. stereotyping d. ethnic bias
In Tennessee v. , the U.S. Supreme Court specified conditions under which deadly force can be used
What will be an ideal response?
Common law is a traditional body of unwritten legal precedents created by court decisions throughout the Middle Ages in England
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following cities was identified as having jails that have become de facto mental institutions?
a. Los Angeles b. Miami c. Dallas d. Chicago