The two cases of Bank of Montreal v. Bal and Corey Developments, deal with the application of the parol evidence rule. Which of the following best explains the different results in these cases?
A) In Corey Developments, a party was trying to get out of a guarantee. In Bal, a party was trying to avoid a warranty.
B) Corey involved a greater inequality of bargaining power than the other two cases.
C) The contract in Corey Developments contained an entire agreement clause, but Bal did not.
D) In Corey Developments, there was very clear external evidence of representations contradicting the terms of the contract, but in Bal the plaintiff's evidence was very weak
E) Corey is an older case and the parol evidence rule is now applied more strictly
D
You might also like to view...
The ________ the level of environmental sensitivity for a given product, the ________ the need for managers to address country-specific economic, regulatory, technological, social, and cultural environmental conditions
A) greater; greater B) lower; greater C) greater; lower D) lower; lower E) stronger; greater
What is the purpose of an interview?
A) To exchange information B) To verify information given in the résumé C) To find the best talent to fill a job opening D) To find the right match for your goals and capabilities E) To maximize salary potential
The best environment for high quality ethical decision making involves "thin air thinking."
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Take a newly launched product (you can use new television commercials as your source) and evaluate where it is placed on the Idea Classification Matrix.
What will be an ideal response?