In Barabin v. AstenJohnson, where Barabin sued for damage suffered from exposure to asbestos, the appeals court held that:
a. the head of a corporation is never required to testify in a deposition
b. the head of a corporation is only required to answer written interrogatories, not appear for a deposition c. the head of a corporation may send a qualified corporate officer to testify in his place
d. the expert witness for AstenJohnson could not be a company employee
e. none of the other choices are correct
e
You might also like to view...
If a caller digresses into chit chat or off-topic conversations, let him go on rather than risk upsetting him
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
When auditors are engaged to make an assertion on a report filed on a printed form designed by authorities, and they believe the assertion is not justified, the auditors should:
A. Submit the form with questionable items clearly omitted. B. Reword the form or attach a separate report. C. Submit a short-form report with explanations. D. Withdraw from the engagement.
Judicial review can best be described as the power of federal courts to
a. abstain from adjudicating major issues and to leave such matters to legislatures. b. take it upon itself to decide issues on constitutional grounds. c. declare a statue or governmental action unconstitutional and void. d. take private property for public use.
All of the following are strategic factors that pertain specifically to a firm and its related businesses except:
A. core competencies. B. synergies. C. technology. D. power of customers.