In the court case of Christopher v. Sinyard, what were the factors that the court noted that lead to the ruling of piercing the corporate shield and holding the principals personal liable?
What will be an ideal response?
The court noted that the owners of this two-person construction company
did not follow corporate formalities, they intermingled their personal money
with that of the corporation, the corporation had no assets, and they
promised the homeowners that certain repairs would be done while
knowing that the company was out of money.
You might also like to view...
Cells that are able to develop into many different types of cells are considered _____________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
After the oil is pressed out of soybeans, what percentage of protein is left in the ground cake?
A) 45% B) 55% C) 35% D) 75%
Design the logic to control the motor on a simple remote control car. There are two buttons on the remote control for the motor. If neither button is pressed, the car stops. If the top button is pressed, the car moves forward. If the bottom button is pressed, the car moves backwards. If both buttons are pressed, the car spins. There are two motors in the car and each motor has two inputs F and B
A high on F makes the car go forward. A high on B makes the car go backward. What will be an ideal response?
ASE-Style Multiple Choice Which of the following statements is LEAST-Likely true?
A. Most weld-through primers have poor adhesion qualities. B. Epoxy primer is sprayed on in the same way as other primers. C. Weld through primers contain acids that eat into the metal to produce better adhesion. D. Two-part epoxy primers are recommended by most automobile makers in place of the standard primer.