The textbook offered the evaluation of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) as an example of a program that had different evaluation outcomes based on the values of the program evaluators. Describe how the evaluators’ perspectives resulted in very different evaluations.
What will be an ideal response?
CETA was evaluated by both the Harvard John F. Kennedy School of Government and the School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkley. The two schools stressed different values and different approaches. The JFK School researchers concentrated on the costs and benefits of the program in strict economic terms, reflecting utilitarian values. They found the program to be failing. The Berkeley researchers stressed the political and participatory aspects of the program. They found the program to be a success, with participants pleased with the outcomes and more involved in society. Both outcomes were correct based on the value systems used in the evaluation.
You might also like to view...
Which statement is accurate regarding democracy and economic development?
A. Democracy always leads to economic development. B. Democracy is required but not sufficient for economic development. C. Democracy has not accompanied economic development in a systematic or general way. D. Democracy has ironically hindered economic development in most countries.
A prime example of investigative reporting is the story about neglect of soldiers at Walter Reed Hospital
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
For most of America's history, foreign and national security policy heavily revolved around
a. combating terrorism. c. containment of communism. b. foreign economic policy. d. acquiring colonies
Those who are less advantageously situated in the social system vote more than often those who are more advantageously situated
Indicate whether the statement is true or false