Less stuff, more happiness | Graham Hill
Evaluate this speech.
1. The speaker did speak appropriately. He asked rhetorical questions, drew from common experiences, and used statistics. He spoke clearly and used words that made you picture what he was saying in your head.
- The speaker did consider characteristics of effective delivery. He spoke as if he was having a conversation with the audience rather than presenting something to them.
- In my opinion, this was a persuasive speech. The speaker was not basing his speak heavily on facts but rather giving his opinion on how crowded our lives are and how having less stuff makes us live happier lives.
- I think the type of proposition the speaker was making is a position of value. He was trying to convince that audience that having less stuff was a good thing and that it was better than having a lot of stuff. The speaker appealed to ethos by relating things to everyone’s lives, I do not feel that he appealed to pathos, but appealed to logos by using facts and visuals.
You might also like to view...
Among the earliest movie stars in the United States was which of the following?
A. Harry Warner B. Humphrey Bogart C. Florence Lawrence D. Natalie Portman
Kyle knew that it was inappropriate to yell at his instructor and swear when protesting his grade. Therefore, he attended to ___________ goals to behave appropriately when he talked with his instructor calmly
a. identity b. relational resource c. arousal maintenance d. interaction
The shift to a corporate entertainment environment in the 1980s and 1990s eradicated the hope that Hollywood could cultivate a culture of the film auteur
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
You can easily obtain transparencies relevant to almost any topic simply by searching them out at any university library, where thousands are on file
Indicate whether the statement is true or false