Why is it important to be able to measure hypothetical constructs?
What will be an ideal response?
If we can't measure our hypothetical constructs, we can't really get a good sense of how they affect behavior. We won't have a good definition of our construct, so applying it will be difficult.
You might also like to view...
The federal court system is comprised of one trial level and two appellate levels.
a. True b. False
How is news on social media generated?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following statements contradicts the hypothesized effect of the variable of political institutions on welfare state spending?
A. Sweden has strong labor integration in the government and is also a strong welfare state. B. Denmark has a relatively homogeneous population and spends nearly 30% of its GDP on welfare. C. Osnia, a small state with regressive taxation favoring businesses, spends very little on social welfare. D. The United States has minimal government intervention in the market and spends much less on social welfare than other nations with comparable wealth. E. Germany has a federal government which frequently approves radical redistributive spending proposals in the legislature.
In the Bakke case, the Supreme Court ruled that
A. affirmative action programs were allowable in law schools, but not to be utilized in medical schools. B. race cannot be the sole factor in admissions decisions. C. all affirmative action programs were unconstitutional. D. race cannot be considered as a factor at all in making admissions decisions. E. quota systems are constitutional.