Explain the difference between conventional and nonconventional war, and describe how World War I and II relate to both categories.
What will be an ideal response?
Conventional war is typically characterized as armed conflict between two or more states in which military forces of each side are used against each other and in which weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons are generally not used. In contrast to conventional war, unconventional war involves armed conflict in which traditional battles between the organized militaries of the participants are less prominent (or avoided altogether). Since the introduction of weapons of mass destruction in World War I and II, the use of such weaponry has been characterized as unconventional warfare, as well. This complicates the definition of war because both world wars are usually considered conventional, and yet, unconventional weapons were used in both, although in a limited capacity. It is still correct to consider both of those conflicts conventional, but today, if weapons of mass destruction were widely used in a conflict, it would certainly be considered unconventional.
You might also like to view...
When an international organization such as the World Bank allows a country to get out of paying back the ?money it owes, this is known as:
A) ?a subsidy B) ?debt forgiveness C) ?nationalization D) ?foreign direct investment E) ?import substitution
Define the national security and social servicestates. Choose one, and explain why it acts as a barrier to reversing the size of the national budget. Which would be easier to reform?
What will be an ideal response?
Government's role is to balance economic growth with environmental protection by regulating polluters in a sustainable manner
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following asks whether the institutions in questions produce good outcomes?
A. consequential ethics B. Condorcet’s paradox C. deontological ethics D. median voter theorem