Define jurisdiction. Define venue. What is the difference between venue and jurisdiction? What is the relationship between state and federal jurisdiction??
What will be an ideal response?
Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear and decide a specific action. Jurisdiction is important because without it, a court cannot hear a case. Venue is the geographic district in which an action is tried and from which the jury is selected. Thus, venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for a trial. For example, two state courts may have the authority to exercise jurisdiction over a case, but it may be more appropriate or convenient to hear the case in one court than in the other. The difference between venue and jurisdiction is that jurisdiction has to do with whether a court has the authority to hear a case, whereas venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for a trial.The relationship between state and federal jurisdiction may be one of either concurrent jurisdiction or exclusive jurisdiction. When both federal and state courts have the power to hear a case, as is true in suits involving diversity of citizenship, concurrent jurisdiction exists.When cases can be tried only in federal courts or only in state courts, exclusive jurisdiction exists. State courts have exclusive jurisdiction over all matters that are not subject to federal jurisdiction, such as family law and probate law.
You might also like to view...
What are some key ethical dilemmas facing HR managers in terms of using selection tests?
What will be an ideal response?
The Equal Protection Clause is found in
A. the Fifth Amendment. B. the Thirteenth Amendment. C. the Fourteenth Amendment. D. the Fifteenth Amendment.
A ________ is a collection of similar records, such as your address book, which has records for names, addresses, cities, and phone numbers
a. document b. chart c. folder d. database
Discuss the consequences a creditor may face for violating the Automatic Stay. Who has the burden of proof in this type of situation? Are all bankruptcy debtors entitled to recover damages in situations where a creditor has violated the provisions of the Automatic Stay?
What will be an ideal response?