In the case In re Marriage of Thornton, 95 Cal. App 4th 251 (2002), there was no triggering event identified in the agreement that terminated alimony. Therefore:
a. The omission caused the alimony award to continue indefinitely.
b. Statutory language was used to enable the husband to terminate alimony upon the remarriage of his ex-spouse.
c. The court automatically had continuing jurisdiction, which enabled the wife to seek additional alimony.
d. Remarriage was found not to be an event that would trigger termination of alimony.
b
You might also like to view...
You are measuring Motivation to Manage, and one of the applicants shows a willingness to want to outdo their peers in work-related activities. This falls into what dimension of the Miner Sentence Completion Scale?
A. competitive games B. competitive situations C. authority figures D. imposing wishes
Demonstrative evidence must always be an exact representation.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online legal research
What will be an ideal response?
A condominium association must be organized no later than the date the last condominium unit is conveyed.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)