In Guz v. Bechtel National the supreme court of California held that Guz, an employee who had been fired and sued for wrongful dismissal had:
a. no cause of action because his performance had been poor
b. no cause of action for breach of implied contract; his best hope was a violation of personnel policies that constituted a contract
c. no cause of action for violation of personnel policies, because the company followed proper procedure, but may have a cause of action for breach of implied contract
d. a cause of action for breach of an implied covenant of fair dealing e. a cause of action for breach of California's employment code
b
You might also like to view...
If the returns of two firms are negatively correlated, then one of them must have a negative beta.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Offering a small product range to a small number of customer groups is:
A. a broad-scope strategy. B. an imitation strategy. C. a narrow-scope strategy. D. a way of reducing market uncertainties.
First Community Credit Union and General Hydraulics. Inc, have their dispute resolved in arbitration. Before determining the award, the arbitrator meets with First Community's representative to discuss the dispute without General Hydraulics' representative being present. If this meeting substantially prejudices General Hydraulics' rights, a court will most likely? A)?compel arbitration
B)?review the merits of the dispute. C)?review the sufficiency of the evidence. D)?set aside any award.
A sample of 16 students showed that the variance in the number of hours they spend studying is 25. At the 5% level of significance, test to see if the variance of the population is significantly different from 30. Use the critical value approach.
What will be an ideal response?