How does collective security differ from the balance of power?
What will be an ideal response?
Varies. The balance of power is a process by which states align to prevent any single state from dominating the international system. Collective security, on the other hand, is an institutional arrangement by which states join their power together (establishing a preponderance of power) in order to deter, compel, or punish an aggressor. Collective security, unlike the balance of power, relies on the establishment of rules for the use of power by an institution whose members are states. The balance of power, on the other hand, is a more or less automatic process that results from the fact that all states want to survive and that the domination of the system by a single state is a threat to their survival.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following institutions is least impacted by public opinion?
a. The presidency b. The Supreme Court c. The House of Representatives d. The Senate
Some Republican members of the House have criticized Speaker Joe Straus for being a
a. Tea Party member. b. closet Democrat. c. Republican d. RINO (Republican in name Only). e. tyrant.
Define a politico and discuss the positive and negative outcomes of this style of representation.
What will be an ideal response?
Which scholar first argued that citizens are not customers, but owners?
a. Gaebler b. Osborne c. Frederickson d. Hammer