In Scheerer v. Fisher where Scheerer, a real estate agent, sued Fisher for failing to pay Scheerer for his services in locating property for Fisher, the appeals court held that:
a. there was no contract or basis for payment to Scheerer
b. there was an implied contract and so Scheerer must be paid
c. there was implied contract, but there was no need to pay Scheerer since the original deal fell through d. there was no contract, but Scheerer should be paid anyway, out of good will
e. none of the other choices are correct
b
You might also like to view...
The one who is to receive the specified amount of money from a note is called the
a. maker of the note. b. payee of the note. c. discounter of the note. d. endorser of the note.
Digital media hinders the ability of a firm to manage an MPR crisis due to the extensive number of platforms and sites used for communicating messages
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
At the end of a month, a business shows the following balances in its ledger
Use this data to prepare a trial balance. What will be an ideal response
Which statement about this Gantt chart is BEST?
A) Activity a has a duration that could be as short as 1 day and as long as 10. B) Activity b probably has activity a as a predecessor. C) No progress has been made on activity c. D) Activity d is the longest activity.