Interpret the reason behind the swift passage of laws between Britain's cabinet and the House of Commons
A) New laws move between the House of Commons and the House of Lords without electoral
delay.
B) The House of Commons consists only of the cabinet's party, which is always loyal to the
prime minister.
C) The cabinet passes new laws to the House of Commons, where the prime minister's party
holds a majority.
D) The prime minister uses "whip" tactics to maintain party coherence in the House of
Commons.
C
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements about the Occupy Wall Street movement is true?
A. Fewer Americans support its goals than support the goals of the Tea Party movement. B. Most of its concerns have been addressed by government so it is unlikely that it will appear again. C. The issues of concern to the Occupy Wall Street movement are consistent with the views of a substantial number of Americans. D. It has coalesced into a political party that successfully elected its first candidate to political office in 2012.
What does a "spike" in oil prices mean?
a. a sudden sharp decline in prices b. a sudden sharp increase in prices c. a sudden sharp decrease followed by a small increase in prices d. a prolonged increase in prices e. a sudden sharp increase followed by similar decrease in prices
In American history, the greatest changes to the government’s role in social welfare came
a. during Abraham Lincoln’s tenure as president. b. immediately after the Revolution. c. immediately after the Civil War. d. during the twentieth century. e. with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
What does the process of collective action tell us about why consensus is hard to come by?
a. Individuals want outcomes at their ideal points and refuse to engage in bargaining and compromise. b. Since power is dispersed across different institutions, there is a lack of coordination. c. Any legislation will have policy winners and losers when societal goals are at odds with individually rational actions. d. The system of separation of powers was not designed to handle the levels of polarization that exist in the current political system.