Define, compare, and contrast the Daubert and Frye doctrines. Which one will, in general result in the introduction of more scientific evidence? Explain your position. Which rule do you think is best? Explain your position
What will be an ideal response?
The Daubert doctrine allows the admission in court of expert testimony pertaining
to scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge that will assist the trier of fact
to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue. The Frye doctrine states
that for scientific evidence to be admissible at trial, the procedures used must be
sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field to
which they belong. The Daubert doctrine will result in the introduction of more
scientific evidence because. There is no requirement that the scientific evidence
have gained general acceptance in the field.
You might also like to view...
Much of the work done in groups takes place through
a. Recapitulating families of origin b. Arguments c. Silence d. All of the above e. None of the above
Size perception is not influenced by sounds
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Dalton Melville identified _______ basic types of informal groups
a. 2 b. 3 c. 4 d. 5 e. none of the above
Radical movements do not exist in the U.S
a. True b. False