How do we reconcile the fact that the elderly are the most fearful of crime yet their victimization risk is relatively low?
What will be an ideal response?
Researchers have theorized that the elderly are more fearful of crime because they are more vulnerable to the ramifications of crime (i.e., not financially independent, lack of physical stamina, etc.). Therefore the ramifications of elderly crime victimization are more devastating (pages 192-194 in text).
You might also like to view...
In our American adversarial judicial system, attorneys represent both the suspect and the people. Frequently, defense attorneys are asked, "How can you defend someone accused of such a horrible crime?" Assume that you are a defense attorney and you need to answer this question. How would you respond?
What will be an ideal response?
Define unity of command.
What will be an ideal response?
Later, Ted comes by and also argues in favor of seeking the death penalty. His point is that other would-be murderers in the community need to see that they face the ultimate penalty for committing murder. He presents you with research that supports the idea that the death penalty deters crime. He says "I can see why you're not crazy about the idea of putting someone to death—that's a terrible
thing. But it's best for the whole community if it sends a message that prevents other murders.". Ted's argument is based on: a. utilitarianism. b. ethics of care. c. deontological ethics. d. ethical formalism.
FISC is aimed at foreign governments and its agents abroad.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)