Which of the following cases limited the rights of juveniles?
A. Kent v. United States
B. In re Gault
C. Schall v. Martin
D. Roper v. Simmons.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
What does the use of a drug-sniffing dog to identify the presence of drugs inside a home and thermal technology looking for the heat from grow lights have in common?
A. Both are considered unconstitutional even if officers have a search warrant. B. Both are acceptable options to identify drug growing operations if officers have been unable to obtain a search warrant. C. Both tactics violate the reasonable expectation of privacy individuals have inside their homes. D. Both would produce evidence that would be admissible in court.
Mr. Johnson, the principal of a school, introduced a primary prevention program to his school. He noticed a decline in drug use among those in the program. He reported to the community his conclusion that the program was effective. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Mr. Johnson's conclusions were accurate. B. Mr. Johnson should examine the results of a control group. C. Mr. Johnson must calculate the program's cost before deciding effectiveness. D. None of these
Which of the following is NOT true about the reform era of policing?
a. This era took place from the early 1900s to the 1960s. b. This era enforced police professionalism. c. The community was invaluable to the police’s effectiveness. d. Detectives were efficient crime solvers.
The ________ approach to ethics looks at which action is the one that will produce the greatest balance of benefits over harms
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word