What is the SEC's position on companies that communicate with investors on social media?
A. It is legal so long as the postings are restricted to Facebook
B. It is legal so long as companies inform investors which outlets they intend to use
C. It is illegal to do so
D. There are no limitations on companies communicating through social media
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
In cluster analysis, the set of variables selected should describe the similarity between objects in terms that are relevant to the marketing research problem
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Individuals who believe that nonprofit organizations should apply business methods of management perceive nonprofit organizations as ______.
A. social institutions B. government institutions C. social enterprises D. education institutions
Which of the following methods improves the transition from one sentence to the next in a formal report??
A) ?Using tabulations and enumerations B) ?Using active voice C) ?Avoiding first-person pronouns D) ?Avoiding the use of tense consistently
Preexisting Duty. New England Rock Services, Inc, agreed to work as a subcontractor on a sewer project on which Empire Paving, Inc, was the general contractor. For drilling and blasting a certain amount of rock, Rock Services was to be paid $29 per
cubic yard or on a time-and-materials basis, whichever was less. From the beginning, Rock Services encountered problems. The primary obstacle was a heavy concentration of water, which, according to the custom in the industry, Empire should have controlled but did not. Rock Services was compelled to use more costly and time-consuming methods than anticipated, and it was unable to complete the work on time. The subcontractor asked Empire to pay for the rest of the project on a time-and-materials basis. Empire signed a modification of the original agreement. On completion of the work, Empire refused to pay Rock Services the balance due under the modification. Rock Services filed a suit in a Connecticut state court against Empire. Empire claimed that the modification lacked consideration and was thus not valid and enforceable. Is Empire right? Why or why not?