Discuss whether the vagueness of the following passage is appropriate to the context that is stated or implied. Pay particular attention to the underlined expressions."The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."-United States Constitution, Fourth Amendment
What will be an ideal response?
A discussion of this passage should highlight the notorious vagueness of "unreasonable" and "probable," as well as the fact that such vagueness is inescapable and (probably) desirable in a "living" constitution-that is, one flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances. "Secure" is another term that students seize upon as too vague. It should be noted that the first claim of the passage, through the word "violated," means simply that people shall not be subject to such searches and seizures.
You might also like to view...
Not all conceivable situations (e.g., time travel) are logically possible because they may
A. violate human rights. B. violate the laws of nature. C. contain hidden contradictions. D. contradict the teachings of the world's great religions. E. none of these
How many sons are born to Jacob?
A. nine B. ten D. fifteen
Who among the following helped launch the scientific revolution by claiming that the Sun, rather than the Earth, is the center of the universe?
A. Nicolaus Copernicus B. Thomas Kuhn C. Albert Einstein D. Francis Bacon
The precise time of Kant's daily walk is well-documented
indicate whethet this statement is true or false