Since 1994, why did support for the death penalty begin to falter in the United States?
What will be an ideal response?
Since 1994, however, support has begun to falter for a number of reasons. First, DNA testing has driven home the obvious fact that human beings make mistakes, including sentencing innocent people to death. There is also a growing belief that the penalty is not administered fairly; rich people can escape it and poor people cannot. This is especially troubling because so many death penalty defendants are members of racial or ethnic minority groups. At the same time, there is growing doubt among the public that the death penalty prevents murder.
You might also like to view...
This is the examination and search by firefighters for hidden flames or sparks that might rekindle the fire
a. tagging b. overhauling c. spark-hunting d. rooting
Youthful offenders referred to juvenile court retain certain constitutional rights, including the
A) privilege to be free from self-incrimination. B) right of notice of the charge(s). C) right to confront witnesses against them. D) right to an attorney. E) all of the above.
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. The difference between a civil and criminal action is always clear. 2. The primary purpose or function of criminal law is to help maintain social order and stability. 3. Criminal procedure is concerned with “what law is enforced.” 4. Whether a conviction is for a felony or misdemeanor is determined by the punishment provided in the statute under which an individual is convicted rather than by the actual punishment imposed.
What are the possible consequences for failing to honor a subpoena or a subpoena duces tecum?
What will be an ideal response?