In Latiolais v. Cravins, the court held that?
A. ?the presiding judge's comments demonstrated that he was impartial, and did not abuse his discretion in dismissing Cravins and in allowing the jury to hear testimony about the content of the settlement agreement.
B. ?the federal court was an inappropriate forum to litigate a controversy that stemmed from a domestic dispute.
C. ?there was no evidence that Cravins, a former state senator and current mayor of Opelousas, and the sheriff's deputy had conspired to wrongfully deprive Latiolais of her civil rights.
D. ?the district court erred in dismissing Cravins and in allowing the jury to hear testimony about the content of the settlement agreement; the court vacated the district court's judgment, remanded Latiolais's action for a new trial, and ordered the chief judge of the Western District of Louisiana to reassign the case to a different district judge.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
What is the function of a personal representative?
What will be an ideal response?
What is the name of the federal law passed in 2002 that all federal court opinions, precedential and non-precedential, are to be made available on the Internet for viewing?
A) E-Government Act of 2002 B) Sunshine Act of 2002 C) Government Accountability Act of 2002 D) Internet Governance Act of 2002
A certificate issued by a federal, state or local governmental agency allowing some action to be taken, is a(n):
a. Permission b. Allowance c. Variance d. Permit
There is a common misconception that individuals and businesses that file for bankruptcy are over-extended, irresponsible money managers who want to get out of paying their debts
Indicate whether the statement is true or false