What is the distinction between "nation" and "state," according to nineteenth-century European standards?

What will be an ideal response?


The terms are easily confused in English, in which they are often used synonymously; however, they are very different concepts. The state is defined as a geopolitical entity with the power to levy taxes, raise armies, enforce laws, attend to certain bureaucratic tasks such as issuing passports, and build a state administrative apparatus. A nation, by contrast, is more a cultural construct, in which people are bound together in a common community defined by language, religion, tradition, or culture. Hence, as nationalism became a major movement in the nineteenth century, it could be promoted through appeal to the emotional characteristics in patriotism, in Romantic concepts such as folk tales, uniqueness of language, and historical traditions. These sought to unify people of diverse backgrounds into one common people in support of a government overseeing a state. These differences are perhaps best seen in Italy and Germany, each of which sought certain nationalist characteristics to unify the component states into one nation in the nineteenth century.

History

You might also like to view...

Which of the following required products from Europe and Asia to be landed in England before being shipped to the colonies?

A) the Navigation Act B) the Export Act C) the Staple Act D) the Woolen Act

History

John Jay's 1794 treaty with Britain

a. increased George Washington's huge popularity. b. provided further evidence of American support for France. c. alienated America from Spain. d. created deeper splits between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. e. led to the election of Thomas Jefferson.

History

The leader who sought to develop Egypt economically and militarily and make it the fountainhead of pan-Arab nationalism during the 1950s was

A. Ayatollah Khomeini. B. Anwar Sadat. C. King Farouk. D. Saddam Hussein. E. Gamal Abdel Nasser.

History

Passage of the Wilmot Proviso of 1846 would have

a. prohibited slavery in any territory acquired as a result of the Mexican War. b. allowed the expansion of slavery into any territory acquired from the Mexican War. c. established popular sovereignty as the means for any future expansion of slavery. d. extended the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific. e. little impact on the North.

History