The way we handle time can express both intentional and unintentional messages. For instance, in a culture like ours that values time highly, waiting can be an indicator of status. "Important" people (whose time is supposedly more valuable than that of others) may be seen by appointment only, whereas it is acceptable to intrude without notice on lesser beings. To see how this rule operates,
consider how natural it is for a boss to drop into a subordinate's office unannounced, whereas the subordinate would never intrude into the boss's office without an appointment. A related rule is that low-status people must never make high-status people wait. It would be a serious mistake to show up late for a job interview, whereas the interviewer might keep you cooling your heels in the lobby. Important people are often whisked to the head of a restaurant or airport line, whereas presumably less exalted masses are forced to wait their turn. The use of time depends greatly on culture. In some cultures, punctuality is critically important, whereas in others it is barely considered. Punctual mainlanders often report welcoming the laid-back Hawaiian approach toward time. One psychologist discovered the difference between North and South American attitudes when teaching at a university in Brazil. He found that some students arrived halfway through a two-hour class and that most of them stayed put and kept asking questions when the class was scheduled to end. A half-hour after the official end of the class, the psychologist finally closed off discussion because there was no indication that the students intended to leave. This flexibility of time is quite different from what is common in North American colleges! "Important" people (whose time is supposedly more valuable than that of others) may be seen by appointment only, whereas it is acceptable to intrude without notice on lesser beings." "To see how this rule operates, consider how natural it is for a boss to drop into a subordinate's office unannounced, whereas the subordinate would never intrude into the boss's office without an appointment." What is the relationship between these two sentences from the first paragraph?
a. summary
b. illustration
c. comparison
d. process
B
You might also like to view...
The names of the months are not capitalized
a. True b. False
Vocabulario Esmeralda Santiago ¿Qué sabes sobre esta escritora puertorriqueña? Lee el siguiente párrafo y llena los espacios en blanco con una opción apropiada de la lista. No todas las opciones se usan.
consiguióapoyabanaciódominandoesperanzaextrañabase trasladósueñopertenecíarealizóéxitoadaptándoseretotierra natalLa escritora Esmeralda Santiago (1) ___________________________ en Puerto Rico en 1948. Cuando tenía trece años, su familia (2) ___________________________ a Nueva York. Al principio Esmeralda (3) ___________________________ mucho su (4) __________________________ pero poco a poco fue (5) __________________________el inglés y (6) ___________________________ a la vida norteamericana. Se puede decir que (7) ___________________________ el (8) ___________________________ americano: de inmigrante pobre a escritora de (9) ___________________________. Su libro Cuando era puertorriqueña (10) ___________________________ un lugar entre los primeros en la lista de best sellers.(10) Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Which sentence best expresses the relationship between the two clauses?
A) The actor had only one goal in life, yet he wanted only fame. B) The actor had only one goal in life since he wanted only fame. C) The actor had only one goal in life; specifically, he wanted only fame. D) The actor had only one goal in life; however, he wanted only fame.
How can you fix the following sentences? Shelia believes in ghosts. Every time she came
over to my old farmhouse, she is unable to sleep. a. Change believes to believed. b. Change came to comes. c. Change came to is coming. d. Change believes to is believing. e. Change came to was coming.