By meeting the burden of proof, the plaintiff has
A) shifted to defendant the burden to rebut plaintiff's case
B) neutralized any claim for indemnification
C) established the defendant's liability beyond a reasonable doubt
D) shown why the res ipsa loquitur doctrine does not apply
A
You might also like to view...
Once filed, a financing statement is effective for the duration of the loan
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Rick located Rena when the baby was born and served her with a summons in the paternity proceeding he filed. A DNA test established a 99.98 percent probability of paternity. Rick served Rena with interrogatories, which she refused to answer. At the trial Rick testified concerning his sexual relations with Rena and offered the DNA report in evidence. Rena did not take the witness stand. The court should:
a. Compel Rena to answer the interrogatories and allow Rick to call Rena as a witness. b. Refuse to accept the HLA report in evidence since it does not exclude Rick as father. c. Accept the report in evidence, refuse to compel Rena to answer the interrogatories, refuse to allow Rick to call Rena as a witness, and draw an unfavorable inference against Rena based on her failure to deny that she had sexual intercourse with Rick at the time of the child’s conception. d. Accept the DNA report in evidence but draw no inferences whatsoever from Rena’s refusal to answer the interrogatories and failure to testify.
A person filing a spurious lien against someone’s real estate commits slander of title.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Policeman John is arresting Philip, but he forgets to inform Philip of his Miranda rights. Philip makes a statement regarding his suspected crime. Philip's statement:
a. Will not be admissible in court b. Will be admissible in court c. Will only be admissible in an appellate court d. Is irrelevant evidence