What problems should someone anticipate in preparing for a peer editing workshop?
What will be an ideal response?
While peer editing workshops can be exceptional tools for developing metacognitive awareness of writing practices, care should be paid to anticipate problems arising from logistics (e.g., do students swap papers or work in larger groups?), motivation (e.g., unwillingness to read another's work carefully), and epistemology (e.g., what does it mean to know about someone's writing). Without guidance, students should not be expected to support one another's writing effectively. Instead, teachers should plan to teach children how to support peer writing beyond finding fault.
You might also like to view...
Play is at the center of the kindergarten program
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which one of the following is OKAY for a teacher to do?
(a) A student who is being disruptive is asked a question for which the answer cannot possible be known by the student. (b) A student gives a wrong response to a question and is then asked an even more difficult question. (c) A student who didn't do the homework assignment is asked a question from the assignment. (d) None of these is okay.
If Damon clenches his fist toward another toddler, he is using gestural language that communicates:
A) aggression B) threatening C) fear and retreat D) attachment
Which of the following provides the best example of how the macrosystem, as described by Bronfenbrenner, influences education?
A. Students interact directly with their teachers. B. Students from ethnic minorities are given adequate transportation facilities to reach the school. C. Teachers go on strike in response to salary cuts. D. A parent influences classroom policies by complaining to the principal of the school.