Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. INSTRUCTIONS: The following selections relate to distinguishing arguments from nonarguments and identifying conclusions. Select the best answer for each. Social psychologists conduct research into areas such as bystander intervention, prejudice, conformity,
aggression, and obedience to authority. However, in order to gain insight into such critical issues, researchers must create vivid events that are involving for their participants. Some of these events, by their very nature, are likely to produce a degree of discomfort in the participants, such as witnessing someone having a seizure. Thus, what is required for good science and what is required for ethical science can be contradictory. Elliot Aronson, et al., Social Psychology
A) Argument, conclusion: Some of these events ... someone having a seizure.
B) Argument, conclusion: Social psychologists conduct ... obedience to authority.
C) Nonargument.
D) Argument, conclusion: In order to gain insight ... involving for their participants.
E) Argument; conclusion: What is required for good science ... contradictory.
E
You might also like to view...
Muhammad's first actual successor (caliph) was his __________
a. cousin, Uthman b. friend, Abu Bakr c. friend, 'Umar d. son-in-law, 'Ali e. wife, Khadija
"If the defendant serves his sentence at a halfway house and this is combined with a criminal conviction, he will receive significant punishment" is
A) an argument ? B) an explanation C) a conditional
By pointing out that the perception of intense heat is identical to intense pain, Berkeley tries to convince us that
a. there really is no such thing as heat. b. heat does not exist outside of the mind. c. our sense experience deceives us. d. too much of a good thing can be bad.
There is nothing we can do to help patients with low literacy understand health care information.
a. true b. false