Explain the reasoning behind the inverted-U theory of R&D expenditures

What will be an ideal response?


The theory suggests that R&D development is at its best with very low concentrations (pure competition) and very high concentrations (pure monopoly). R&D compared to sales is low in the case of purely competitive firms because the firms are relatively small in relation to the market, meaning it’s harder for those firms to engage in R&D. R&D compared to sales is low for monopolies because profits are already high for these firms and innovation is not likely to add much more to their profits. Moreover, innovations will likely involve costly renovations of plants. Finally the lack of competition provides monopolies with little incentive to innovate.
The optimum industry structure for R&D is one in which expected returns on R&D are high and financing is relatively inexpensive. These factors most frequently occur in industries where there are a few firms but not so few that smaller firms can’t provide viable competition. In sum, a ‘loose’ oligopoly structure is best for R&D.

Economics

You might also like to view...

What are the characteristics of a market that allow a monopolist to successfully price discriminate between groups?

What will be an ideal response?

Economics

Which of the following goods is least likely to be in a market basket?

A. Shuttle service B. Airfare C. Streetlamps D. Coffee beans

Economics

Goods and services purchased from international sources are

A. Net exports. B. Gross investment. C. Imports. D. Exports.

Economics

A situation in which the market system allocates too few resources to the production of a given activity is known as

A. market efficiency. B. market failure. C. market signaling. D. market allocation.

Economics