Why are abstract reasoning skills, and knowledge of international history, important in understanding and combating terrorism? What are your views?
What will be an ideal response?
• Modern terrorism is an abstract, nebulous concept, which fluctuates according to historical and political circumstances.
• To combat terrorism, security forces require groups of people with abstract reasoning skills, knowledge of international politics and history, and specialized expertise in particular regions.
• If the police are to participate as full partners in this process, they must bring skilled specialists to the table.
• The philosophy behind policing, however, rejects this logic.
• American law enforcement relishes pragmatic information with immediate applicability on the beat.
• Localized attitudes bring contempt from intelligence agencies.
• Unlike analysts in defense intelligence, state and local police officers frequently exhibit no concern for in-depth background information, the kind of information needed to understand intelligence.
• As a result, intelligence bureaucracies frequently question police competence. Intelligence analysts know information is not usually valuable until it is categorized and placed within social and political contexts.
• If police agencies are unable to engage in this type of examination, intelligence organizations are hesitant to form partnerships with them.
• These factors present enormous problems as the DHS tries to create a network of information.
You might also like to view...
What are the three major legislative levels of law enforcement?
a. State, city, county b. Federal, county, campus c. County, city, federal d. State, federal, local
According to Knox's (2000) study, what percentage of inmates report gang membership?
a. 10% b. 25% c. 50% d. 75%
A psychological principle that holds that the frequency of any behavior can be increased or decreased through reward, punishment, and association with other stimuli is
A) heritability. B) behavioral conditioning. C) profiling. D) psychoanalysis.
In which 1974 case did the Supreme Court set forth that inmates had some due process rights when facing a prison disciplinary hearing?
A) Grummet v. Rushen B) Bell v. Wolfish C) Wolff v. McDonnell D) Morrissey v. Brewer