Discuss the role of the judge within the courtroom work group
What will be an ideal response?
The public believes that judges are the principal decision makers in courts. Often they are not. They are constrained by the actions of other members of the courtroom work group. Although judges still retain the formal legal powers of their office, they often informally share these powers with other members of the courtroom work group. Sanctions can be applied against judges who deviate from the consensus of the courtroom work group. Judges who fail to move their docket may be transferred to less desirable duties. By no means are judges totally controlled by the courtroom work group. As the most prestigious members of the group, they can bring numerous pressures to bear on prosecutors, defense attorneys, and others.
The amount of influence judges actually exert on the other members of the courtroom work group varies. Some judges are active leaders of the courtroom work group. On the other hand, some judges have a laissez-faire attitude, allowing the attorneys as many continuances as they request. In large courts, "judge shopping" is a common practice. Although organizational pressures work to provide a certain degree of consistency among judges, any examination of a multi-judge court immediately shows that judges differ in terms of the sentences they hand out, the way they run their courtroom, and the number of cases they have pending. Knowledge of these judicial differences is often as necessary for the practicing attorney as mastery of the law and rules of procedure.
You might also like to view...
"Diverse groups," as the term is used in the textbook, refers to persons of a different race or ethnicity than the major population
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which drug have police in America ranked as the # 1 drug the battle today?
a. crack cocaine b. powered cocaine c. heroin d. methamphetamine
Why are quarantines and evacuations sometimes an ineffective response to WMD terrorism?
a. Quarantines do not actually prevent disease from spreading and evacuations bottleneck highways. b. A lot of the people very susceptible to disease do not have cars. c. Most Americans are no longer watching TV for news and would probably not get the message in time. d. The public may not comply with quarantine or evacuation orders and, in fact, the imposition of a quarantine may make matters worse by generating panic where there was none.
Describe the forms of prosecutorial conduct outlined in Brady v. Maryland (1963).
What will be an ideal response?