George and Fred agree orally that Fred will purchase George's lawnmower for $500. They also agree orally that George will help Fred plant his garden in exchange for the use of Fred's pool once a week during the summer. George then presents Fred with a
written agreement for the purchase of the lawnmower, and Fred signs it. Is the second oral contract still enforceable under the Parol Evidence Rule?
A) No, because the written agreement was the only valid contract between George and Fred.
B) Yes, because bilateral contracts are not subject to the Parol Evidence Rule.
C) No, because the written agreement discharges all prior agreements between the parties.
D) Yes, because the pool-for-planting agreement was not inconsistent with or within the scope of the lawnmower purchase agreement.
D
Ref: 1513015250
You might also like to view...
________ is the taking property from or near a building damaged or destroyed by a fire, riot, or natural disasters.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The Automatic Stay remains in effect until
A) The bankruptcy court judge lifts or removes it upon formal request of the creditor B) The debtor's case is dismissed or closed C) The debtor is granted or denied a discharge D) All of the above E) None of the above
A system created in the early twentieth century to provide minimalmedical coverage and benefits for injured workers.
A. Personal injury B. Workers’ compensation C. Medical malpractice D. Equitable distribution
An option is an option contract and requires an offer and an acceptance.?
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)