Can a plaintiff's contributory negligence negate any claim in strict liability?
A) no, since everyone knows that parrots are inherently dangerous
B) yes, because this defense applies to intentional torts as well
C) no, if plaintiff knew that tigers are inherently dangerous
D) yes, because the defendant did not know that the animal had a propensity for violence
C
You might also like to view...
Special damages are not a direct consequence of a defendant's wrong.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Benjamin, a college freshman angry about his low math grade, writes on the blackboard in his college class of 45 students that their teacher, Professor Humphries, is unqualified to teach their algebra class because he flunked out of community college. Professor Humphries earned a doctoral degree in mathematics from the University of Chicago, a very prestigious institution. Which of the following
statements is true? a. Benjamin has committed slander. b. Benjamin has committed libel. c. Benjamin has not committed defamation. d. Benjamin cannot be found liable because he is a minor.
In contrast to small law firms, large law firms?
A. ?are more formal. B. ?offer lower salaries. C. ?offer few benefits. D. ?tend to provide free parking.
Which of the following would necessitate the reopening of an estate??
A. The location of additional omitted property of the decedent after the estate has been closed and discharged? B. A creditor seeking to collect a valid but undischarged claim? C. The personal representative committed fraud or inadequate disclosure to a creditor related to the settlement of the decedent's estate? D. ?A claim against a decedent's estate that arose before the decedent's death is presented six months after the date of the first publication of notice to creditors