Summarize and discuss the Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project case. What were the main issues being discussed? What were the findings in the case? Do you agree or disagree?
What will be an ideal response?
Students must sufficiently summarize the case by providing facts such as the different parties involved, the relevant terms in the law that the individuals were debating, and how the court defined these terms. The court ruled that the law is able to prohibit support, in the form of speech, if such speech furthers the objection of the organization.
You might also like to view...
A qui tam action:
a. Can result in debarment to the offender. b. Is a type of forfeiture action. c. Allows private citizens to share in any monetary settlement arising from their report of a false or fraudulent claim against the government. d. Is a discovery proceeding under administrative law.
Al Qaeda seeks to unite Muslims to fight the West, except for the United States
a. True b. False
The most significant problem of chemical weapons is that they can be deployed and it may be days or weeks before the deployment becomes evident.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
How is age correlated with crime?
a. Age is inversely related to crime - younger people commit more crime b. Age is not correlated with crime - anyone can commit crime. c. Middle aged males, 30-45, commit the most crime. d. Age is correlated with crime only if referring to males.