Why were the French less likely than the British to use military force when dealing with the native peoples of North America?
A. The French population was relatively low.
B. French soldiers were much less effective fighters than their British counterparts.
C. As Catholics they naturally were more benevolent when dealing with the native peoples.
D. They had superior diplomatic skills.
A. The French population was relatively low.
You might also like to view...
Among the uprisings that broke out in the first half of the nineteenth century, why did some succeed, and why did some fail?
What will be an ideal response?
The __________ Accords recognized both Soviet influence in Eastern Europe and the rights of citizens.
A. Helsinki B. Tehran C. Oslo D. Prague
What saved the Revolution as a whole when the "revolution of the lawyers" appeared doomed by the threat of royal armed forces in the summer of 1789?
a. The betrayal of the monarchy by high clergymen b. The defection of key nobles of the sword to the rebels c. The intervention of armed commoners, especially in urban uprisings d. The outside influence of mercenary troops paid by the rebels e. The intervention of Britain, whose constitutional monarch seemed threatened by upheaval in France
Many historians now believe that Alger Hiss did pass along information to the Soviets in the 1930s and 1940s
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false