Consider this argument: Some F are G No G are H Which conclusion would make this a deductively valid logical form?
A. No F are H
B. Some H are F
C. All G are F
D. Some F are not H
Ans: D. Some F are not H
You might also like to view...
What is the largest corporation in the world at the start of the twenty-first century?
a. Ford c. General Electric b. Wal-Mart d. Nokia
Kant agreed with the rationalists that
a. the idea of God is innate. b. knowledge does not begin with experience. c. knowledge must be universal, necessary, and certain. d. reason alone can tell us what necessarily exists.
Explain the categories of euthanasia: voluntary, involuntary, nonvoluntary, active, and passive. Why would euthanasia be considered a negative right? How might it be considered a positive right?
What will be an ideal response?
What was at the core of Rousseau's philosophy?
a. He believed that humans were the same as animals at their core. b. He believed that animals had more of a soul than humans. c. He believed that humans have an intrinsic core or essence that distinguishes them from other animals. d. He believed that women were superior to men.