How did immigrants and native-born people compare in terms of family in the late nineteenth century?
A) Immigrants married earlier than native-born people and, as a result, had more children.
B) Immigrant families had fewer children than native-born families, mostly because they lived in cramped tenements that could not support large families.
C) Immigrants tended to marry later and have more children than native-born people.
D) Immigrant families were usually headed by single women, whereas native-born families tended to be nuclear families.
E) Immigrants married much earlier than native-born people, and also tended to die at much earlier ages.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Why do historians believe that India was unable to maintain a unified empire?
a. India was unable to profit from its agricultural system. b. India lacked a dynamic leader. c. India's declining regional trade fueled the growth of smaller kingdoms and a shift toward agriculture. d. India's diverse religions divided the people and made unity impossible. e. India's complex geography made it difficult to unify far-flung sections.
What was the result of the Pinckney Treaty?
What will be an ideal response?
Cubism involves the
A) reorganizing of figures into cubes that are displaced. B) breaking down and reordering of nature in artistic form. C) deconstruction of figures in to boxes. D) a three dimensional rendering of pieces of a figure. E) None of these
President Roosevelt's 1936 reelection was the greatest landslide victory to that point in the history of American presidential elections.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)