Explain the difference between factual and proximate cause
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: The link between the act and the resulting harm. Factual cause is insufficient for criminal liability, which can be examined through the "but for" test. Instead, for there to be legal cause, the harm must be the proximate result of the act. Proximate cause is present when the resulting harm is the direct and probable result of the criminal act. Discuss the concept of foreseeability in that the precise harm or injury need not have been anticipated by the actor, but only that which is reasonable in light of all the facts and circumstances surrounding a particular act. Discuss the supervening and intervening acts, as well as the common law "year and a day" rule in murder cases. Explain how factual causality can be determined through the sine qua non test, which holds, in effect, "without this, that would not be."
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not an example of a constitutional power?
a. Power to grant pardons. b. Giving a State of the Union address. c. Power to veto. d. The power to use federal troops to quell domestic disturbances. e. Use of executive orders.
_________ warfare is the concept of using information technology to gain tactical or strategic advantage over an opponent during a conflict
Fill in the blanks with correct word
Mauer (2006) contends that since the no policy has impacted Black incarceration more than the War on Drugs.
a. 1960s b. 1970s c. 1980s d. 1990s
Achievement-oriented leadership emphasizes the leader's expectations and the tasks that subordinates perform
Indicate whether the statement is true or false