When did the dissenting justices believe the majority status should have been determined?
The dissenting justices believe that the Board should have waited until the full work force had been employed. If the Board had waited, in this case, until April 15, 1983, less than a majority of predecessor employees would have been found to be working for Fall River.
You might also like to view...
Discuss in detail Abraham Maslow's concept of a hierarchy of needs
Given the high risk of universal and variable life policies, their market share has steadily declined
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
The internal rate of return method assumes that the cash flows generated by the project are immediately reinvested elsewhere at a rate of return that equals the company's cost of capital.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Trees are a form of real property
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false