You observe that when stock prices rise, interest rates soon fall, and therefore conclude that higher stock prices lead to lower interest rates. This would be an example of:
A. The fallacy of composition
B. Tradeoff among economic goals
C. The post hoc fallacy
D. The use of loaded terminology
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
When investment increases, the multiplier points out that
A) consumption decreases by a greater amount. B) consumption increases by the same amount. C) real GDP increases by a greater amount. D) ultimately investment increases by more than the initial increase. E) real GDP decreases by a greater amount.
The "Anything-Can-Happen" theorem doesn't really imply "anything can happen" in a democratic process with multiple issues; rather, it implies that political outcomes can be manipulated, and some political institutions are better at constraining the degree to which this can be done than others. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
The table above gives production information for Bob's Baseball Cap Company. Bob's total cost when zero caps are produced is $200 and workers cost $10 per hour. The average fixed cost of producing 25 baseball hats per hour is
A) $1.60 B) $8.00. C) $9.60. D) More information is needed to answer the question.
Bancroft Pharmaceuticals has a patent on a new medication used to treat high blood pressure, so it is the monopoly seller of this new drug product
The marginal cost of producing one dose of the drug is $10, and the elasticity of demand for the product is -3. What is the profit maximizing monopoly price for this patented drug product? A) $10 B) $12.50 C) $15 D) $30