How do officers differentiate between what can be found in open spaces and the use of a flashlight to get a better view different from using a device for enhanced surveillance, such as night vision goggles and an extremely sensitive eavesdropping device?
What well-defined legal principles can officers reference in making their decisions about the legality of their searches?
What will be an ideal response?
ANSWER: Answers may vary: In Kyllo v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held a search with a heat-seeking device to detect thermal images was an unreasonable search. Using a device to help aid a search is legal; using a device to see with the bare eye what the officer could not normally see is not legal.
You might also like to view...
Most sex crimes are committed for which of the following reasons?
a. Power over the victim b. Control of the victim c. Love of the victim d. Sexual gratification e. All of the above
The concept of _______________ sanctions essentially means that the severity of the punishment should fit the crime.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The holding in Kolender v. Lawson states ______.
a. the right to bear arms extends to citizens with no connection to the militia b. fighting words are not protected by the First Amendment c. void for vagueness was aimed to inform citizens of prohibited acts and provide definite standards for the enforcement of the law d. ex post facto laws are prohibited
To punish an otherwise innocent person for another's criminal act is called vicarious liability
a. True b. False