For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.Daniel was bad yesterday. He let only one of the two children who live next door ride his new bike.
What will be an ideal response?
A child should treat other children equitably when playing with a new possession.
You might also like to view...
The conclusion of "Bus advertisement in Texas: ‘Unbelievers should repent. Because otherwise they're going to Hell'" is
A) Unbelievers should repent B) Otherwise they're going to Hell C) Unbelievers are not going to Hell
Melvin Anshen suggests that there is an relationship between business and society which he termed as
A) "share the wealth". B) "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer". C) "social contract". D) "one for all and all for one".
As a lexical definition, Emma Goldman's definition "Patriotism: A superstition artificially created and maintained through a network of lies and falsehoods" may be criticized as:
A) Being negative. B) Being too narrow. C) Being affective. D) Being figurative. E) Being too broad.
According to the cultural relativist, a group that practices cannibalism is
a. morally inferior to our own b. morally superior to our own c. neither morally inferior nor morally superior d. really hungry