In the Matter of Kmart Corp, where some creditors objected to the bankruptcy judge decision that "critical vendors" were to be paid first so that the store might stay in business, the appeals court held that the decision of the bankruptcy judge was:
a. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential payment of one class of creditors and so the critical-vendors order could stand
b. the creditors who objected were unreliable and so should not be paid
c. the record did not show the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which would be necessary to allow the preferential payment of one class of creditors but the critical-vendors order could stand anyway
d. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential payment of one class of creditors, but the critical-vendors order could not stand due to the special circumstances of the case
e. none of the other choices are correct
e
You might also like to view...
What model depicts how individuals develop their giving relationship with an organization?
A. giving life cycle B. gift standards chart C. fundraising pyramid D. philanthropy flowchart
In determining the legality of a merger, market concentration has no significance
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A(n) ________ annuity provides a specific return on your investment so you know how much money you will receive at a future point
A) guaranteed B) fixed C) variable D) insured
To discover use cases, we must first discover business processes and functions through domain definition and domain analysis
Indicate whether the statement is true or false