Marian Corporation has two separate divisions that operate as profit centers. The following information is available for the most recent year: Black Division Navy Division Sales (net) $200,000 $400,000 Salary expense 28,000 48,000 Cost of goods sold 100,000 159,000 The Black Division occupies 20,000 square feet in the plant. The Navy Division occupies 30,000 square feet. Rent is an indirect expense and is allocated based on square footage. Rent expense for the year was $50,000. Compute departmental income for the Black and Navy Divisions, respectively.
A. $52,000; $163,000.
B. $72,000; $193,000.
C. $100,000; $241,000.
D. $172,000; $352,000.
E. $72,000; $163,000.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
The COSO principle that an organization should identify and assess changes that significantly impact the system of internal control is related to which COSO component?
a. Control Environment b. Risk Assessment c. Control Activities d. Monitoring
Publicity can be very useful, especially in ________
A) explaining how easy it is to use a simple product or service B) minimizing the effect of a big budget C) announcing a new product or service D) responding to praise from competitors
What is a post audit? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the post audit?
Contract Modification. Ellen and Gabriel Fineman held MasterCards issued by Citibank. Holders of these cards paid an annual $15 fee. The issuance and use of the cards were governed by a retail installment credit agreement, which contained the following
statement: "We can change this Agreement including the finance charge and the annual percentage rate at any time." The agreement did provide for thirty days' notice of any such changes, and the cardholder had a right to reject the changes in writing and return the credit card. Two months before the expiration of the Finemans' cards, Citibank notified them that it was increasing its annual fee to $20; however, Citibank was also providing its cardholders with extra services and benefits, such as "$100,000 common carrier travel insurance." The Finemans did not object in writing, nor did they return the cards. Citibank added 83 cents to the Finemans' next bill, the prorated portion of the increase for the two months remaining on their cards. The Finemans filed suit (a class-action lawsuit on behalf of all cardholders) to recover the increased charges. Among other claims, the Finemans argued that the modification failed because the travel insurance was not adequate consideration for the modification, because they never received any benefits from the insurance, and because its cost to Citibank was negligible. Was there adequate and legally sufficient consideration for Citibank's modification of the annual credit card fee?