Discuss the contention that it is often impossible to distinguish normative statements from empirical observations about politics.
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. While it is often true that it is difficult to distinguish normative statements from empirical observations in politics, ultimately it might not matter as "enhancing what we know about politics and what we value should make us more effective in knowing how to behave politically-as voters, political activists, and political decision makers."
2. In other words, "even those who use the scientific method to study politics do not assume it can provide a compelling answer to every important normative question. However, if it does provide more reliable knowledge, then it enhances our capacity to reason about the questions of what should be done."
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is TRUE regarding rescission as a remedy?
a. It will not be granted if money damages would be adequate to compensate the injured party. b. It is never granted in contracts involving unique items of personal property. c. It is granted frequently in contracts involving the sale of goods. d. It is available for the enforcement of contracts for personal services.
The 114th Congress has become more diversified and included _____ members who were Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist.
A) 12
B) 23
C) ?5
D) ?61
E) 2
How would you change existing legislation in order to find an acceptable compromise between the freedoms of the press (e.g., freedom of speech, protection of sources) and the ability of the government to perform its duties (e.g
, safeguarding national security, prosecuting illegal activities)? What will be an ideal response?
Migration to U.S. cities from abroad was larger than migration from U.S. rural areas
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.