In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992 case involving a state’s denial of a permit to construct houses on island lots), the Court held that ______.
A. the state’s denial of a building permit was not a taking because it was a reasonable regulation for the preservation of the coastal environment
B. the state’s denial of a building permit with the intent of eventually placing a state park on the land was a taking that required compensation
C. the state’s denial of a building permit with the intent of eventually placing a state park on the land would not constitute a taking until the time the state actually began construction of the park
D. the state’s denial was a taking because it deprived Lucas of the beneficial economic uses of his land
E. the denial was a reasonable application of existing zoning standards
D. the state’s denial was a taking because it deprived Lucas of the beneficial economic uses of his land
You might also like to view...
The application of an amount or frequency of force greater than that required to compel compliance from a willing or unwilling subject is known as ________
a. threat of force b. unreasonable force c. deadly force d. excessive force
Inmates who are believed to pose a threat to other prisoners and/or correctional officers based on gang membership or who have incited or threatened to incite a disturbance are likely to be transferred to this type of facility
a. The big house. b. A mega jail c. A penitentiary. d. A control or secured housing unit.
Which country created the Gender Recognition Act that resulted in the issuing of guidelines that mandate an establishment permits prisoners to consider themselves transsexual?
a. Canada b. United States c. Australia d. United Kingdom
Deontological ethics would agree that we should allow incarcerated criminals to be released from prison early if they willingly participate in medical experiments that could save the lives of other people
a. True b. False