How does routine activity theory apply to the use of intermediate sanctions? Explain the tenets of the theory, and provide at least one specific example of how the use of intermediate sanctions dovetails with this theory.

Question

What will be an ideal response?

Answer 1

For the most part, the tenets of routine activity theory devised by Cohen and Felson reflect the general premise behind most intermediate sanctions. Cullen and Agnew provide a clear and effective synopsis of this theory in the following statement: Crime occurs when there is an intersection in time and space of a motivated offender, an attractive target, and a lack of capable guardianship. People’s daily routine activities affect the likelihood they will be an attractive target and will encounter an offender in a situation where no effective guardianship is present. Intermediate sanctions work to eliminate the likelihood that offenders will not have effective guardianship. In other words, an effective guardian will protect potential victims. This guardian is the use of surveillance devices and supervision programs utilized by community supervision agencies. Furthermore, when agencies keep the community informed and when the community is encouraged to volunteer and partner with the agency, an additional layer of oversight is added to the offender’s supervision.