Which of the following is correct in determining that there is no proximate cause?
a. The result was unforeseeable.
b. The result was foreseeable, but it arose in an unforeseeable manner.
c. The plaintiff was not foreseeable.
d. All statements are correct.
D
You might also like to view...
What is eminent domain? Who has the power to exercise eminent domain and under what circumstances?
What will be an ideal response?
Cloud-based e-discovery rather than on-premise software can result in
a. lower costs. b. unpredictable "spikes" in expenses. c. more time required for training. d. less flexibility.
Julie Robbins, a famous actress, is attending a charity event at which she will speak on behalf of an environmental organization to solicit funds for its efforts in educating people about the effects of global warming. As she is walking into the event venue, using a "private" back entrance, a member of the paparazzi takes her picture, to sell to the tabloid press. Has the tort of intrusion been
committed by the photographer against Julie? a. Yes, because taking the photograph was an act of intrusion. b. Yes, because taking the photograph when Julie was attending a charity event is an action that is highly offensive to a reasonable person. c. Yes, because the photographer invaded Julie's private affairs or concerns. d. No, because taking Julie's photograph while she was walking in a public place is not an invasion into her private affairs or concerns.
Brett and Jackie went to a timeshare sales meeting. After the meeting they decided that it was a good idea to buy a timeshare and signed a contract. Three days later they reconsidered their decision. They want to terminate the contract and not buy the timeshare. Can they legally do this?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).