In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court decided that
A. the federal government had the power to regulate commerce within states when commerce between or among states was involved.
B. the federal government's limited ability to regulate interstate commerce was sharply curtailed by a narrow definition of "commerce."
C. the federal government had authority to regulate only international commerce, not interstate commerce.
D. states retained full authority to regulate commerce within their own borders and among their immediate neighbors.
E. although the federal government could regulate interstate commerce, states had sole power to regulate commerce within state borders.
Answer: A. the federal government had the power to regulate commerce within states when commerce between or among states was involved.
You might also like to view...
President Nixon refused to resign his office despite the Watergate Scandal
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following about the Russian economy is TRUE?
a. Wage differentials have decreased substantially since the economic upturn that began in 1999. b. The average level of disposable income has decreased steadily since market reforms were introduced in the early 1990s. c. Many Russians of all age groups question some of the values underlying market reform. d. Urban residents have been less likely to benefit from market reform than rural residents. e. Russians have less access to a greater variety of consumer goods.
The right to privacy is based in "zone of privacy", found in each of the following EXCEPT
A. the First Amendment. B. the Fourth Amendment. C. the Fifth Amendment. D. the Ninth Amendment. E. the Tenth Amendment.
According to your textbook, what seems to be the trend regarding iron triangles in American politics?
a. They are less common than in the past. b. They are less powerful than in the past. c. They are much stronger than in the past. d. They are weaker than in the past.