Imagine that you are a judge faced with receiving an oral argument on a recent appeals case. You have the opportunity to eliminate oral arguments, as some judges have deemed them to not be very helpful. You are undecided in this case. You have a heavy caseload and don't particularly have time to hear the oral argument, but wonder if it's still in your duty to hear it. What would help you decide whether to hear the argument or not? Does it matter what type of case it is, or is it more a matter of personal preference? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
Student responses may vary.
You might also like to view...
_______________ (use acronym) is a Columbian terrorist group that has converged and become more of a criminal organization and the radical ideology that initiated the groups has fallen to secondary
Fill in the blanks with correct word
Which of the following is the purpose of law enforcement agencies in the criminal justice system?
A. To conduct trials and formulate sentences for crimes B. To monitor, treat, and rehabilitate convicted offenders C. To investigate crimes and apprehend suspects D. All of the above
According to the text, the “broken windows” concept ______.
A. contends that neighborhood citizens must not welcome former inmates into the community B. calls for the improvement and upkeep of communities. C. does not involve the community members D. a neat neighborhood appearance has no effect on the likelihood of crime.
The analogy between police leadership and coaching
a. Is always relevant c. Is only sometimes relevant b. Is never relevant d. Is irrelevant